On this page
- The short version
- Earlier studies
- Also found
- How I did it
- 0164% of the passages AI Overviews quoted start at a heading or right below one
- 02The passage AI Overviews quoted held 43% of the searcher's words, against 25% for the rest of the page
- 0364% of the quotes in AI Overviews start in the first 30% of the page
- 049.8% of the passages AI Overviews quoted sat under a question-style heading, against 10.3% of other passages
- 0538% of the source cards in AI Overviews were lists Google made from the page
- 0662% of the quotes that start inside a paragraph of three or more sentences start at its first sentence, against 28% by chance
- 07The passages AI Overviews quoted held fewer names than the rest of their page: 16% of their words, against 26%
- What I would test
- Limits
- Data
- Cite this study
- About the author
Search Google for "how to check word count in microsoft word" and the AI Overview cites a Business Insider guide. The words on its source card are the page's own: a heading, "How to check your word count in Microsoft Word", and the line right under it. That passage starts 156 words into the page's 1,023 words of main text, about a sixth of the way down. I wanted to know how typical that is. Where on a page do Google's AI Overviews quote from, and what does the quoted passage have that the rest of the same page does not? So I read the web pages the AI Overviews cited for 900 questions and compared each quoted passage with the rest of its own page.
“How to check your word count in Microsoft Word The simplest way to check your word count is by looking down. By default, you can s...”
How to check your word count in Microsoft Word
The simplest way to check your word count is by looking down.
By default, you can see your current word count in a small box in the bottom-left corner of every Microsoft Word window.
The short version
The passage Google's AI Overviews quoted started at a heading or right below one 64% of the time, against 31% for other passages of the same length on the same page, and it held 43% of the searcher's words, against 25%.
A snapshot shows what Google's AI Overviews quote, not what changes it, so the points below are bets to test, not rules. Under each one are the numbers behind it and the finding they come from. The full version, with the strongest objection to each bet, is in What I would test.
- BetPut the answer in the block right under its heading.Evidence in Finding 1:
- 64% of the passages AI Overviews quoted start at a heading or in the first block below it; 31% of other passages on the same page do.
- 40% of the quoted passages in AI Overviews start with the heading itself, against 16% of other passages.
- BetUse the searcher's words in that heading and passage.Evidence in Finding 2:
- The passage AI Overviews quoted held 43% of the question's words; other passages on the same page held 25%. The quoted passage held more of them for 2,295 of 3,243 quotes.
- The heading above an AI Overview quote held 33% of the question's words, against 22% for the headings above other passages.
- BetAnswer early on the page, in the first sentence of a paragraph.Evidence in Finding 3 and Finding 6:
- 64% of the quotes in AI Overviews start in the first 30% of the page; the median quote starts 19% of the way down.
- 62% of the quotes that start inside a paragraph of three or more sentences start at its first sentence, against 28% by chance.
- BetTest question-style headings and lists before rewriting pages into them.Evidence in Finding 4:
- 9.8% of the passages AI Overviews quoted sat under a question-style heading, against 10.3% of other passages on the same page.
- 13% of the quoted passages in AI Overviews started in a list, against 23% of other passages.
What earlier studies found
- Kevin Indig found that 44.2% of 18,012 verified ChatGPT citations came from the first 30% of the page (Growth Memo). In the same study he reported that 53% of citations came from the middle of a paragraph, 24.5% from its first sentence and 22.5% from its last, and that heavily cited text had an entity density of 20.6%, against about 5 to 8% for normal English text. Findings 6 and 7 test those and his other signals on Google's AI Overviews.
- Tarek Reslan at CXL found that 55% of 100 Google AI Overview citations came from the first 30% of the page (CXL).
- Bart Magera at Advanced Web Ranking found that cited passages more often showed a fresh date (80% against 53%) and named their subject first (96% against 82%) than passages Google showed on the same results page without citing, across 112 hand-coded passages (Advanced Web Ranking).
What's new here: The position result repeats theirs at a larger scale for Google's AI Overviews (2,055 of 3,203 quotes, Finding 3). The new part is the comparison inside the same page, which now also covers Kevin Indig's other ChatGPT signals (Findings 6 and 7). Each quoted passage is set against up to twelve other passages of the same length on its own page, across 3,243 quotes in AI Overviews, which separates what Google picked from what the page offered.
Also found
- 94% of the searches showed an AI Overview. How-to questions: 98%. SEO agency searches: 84% (Data).
- Google made 38% of the source cards in AI Overviews into lists. It wrote the list's opening line itself in 23% of the list cards whose opening line could be checked (Finding 5).
- YouTube was 30% of the source cards in AI Overviews. Which second of a video they link to is in my YouTube study.
How I did it
- The questions 900 Google searches on 24 September 2026: the 600 how-to questions of my YouTube study and the 300 SEO agency hiring searches of my agency study, asked again, US results, one run.
- The pages Every web page the AI Overviews cited: a plain request first, then a real browser for pages that refused it. Social and forum threads, Google's own pages and YouTube are counted but kept out of the page measures.
- Finding the quote The card's words on the page, in order: at least five of the card's words in the same order, and at least 60% of them. Lists are matched item by item, and tables cell by cell: Google shows only some of a table's columns.
- Where it starts The block where the card's first words are, skipping a page title Google repeats. When the card's opening words (a section heading, a list's opening line) sit above the rest on the page, the quote starts there.
- The comparison For each quote, up to twelve passages of the same length drawn at random from the rest of the same page's main text, each starting where a block starts, as quotes do.
Finding 0164% of the passages AI Overviews quoted start at a heading or right below one
The passage Google's AI Overviews quoted started at a heading, or in the first block under a heading, 64% of the time. Other passages of the same length on the same page did 31% of the time.
Counting only starts at the heading itself: 40% of the quoted passages in AI Overviews, against 16% of other passages. Of all the quotes found, 40% started in a heading, 40% in a paragraph and 13% in a list item. A quote in AI Overviews ran across a median of two blocks: a heading and the text below it, or a sentence and the next.
Finding 02The passage AI Overviews quoted held 43% of the searcher's words, against 25% for the rest of the page
I counted how many of the question's words (leaving out words such as "how", "to" and "the") appear in the quoted passage, and in each of the other passages. The passage Google's AI Overviews quoted held 43% of them on average; other passages on the same page held 25%. The quoted passage held more of the question's words than the rest of its page for 2,295 of 3,243 quotes, and fewer for 880.
The heading above an AI Overview quote carries the question's words too: 33% of them, against 22% for the headings above other passages.
Finding 0364% of the quotes in AI Overviews start in the first 30% of the page
Measured as the share of the page's main text above the quote, the median quote in Google's AI Overviews started 19% of the way down, 284 words in. 33% of the quotes in AI Overviews started in the first tenth of the page, 64% in the first 30% (62% to 66%) and 18% in the second half.
Answers sit higher for the SEO agency searches: 69% of their quotes in AI Overviews started in the first 30%, against 61% for the how-to questions, where pages often open with context before the steps.
Finding 049.8% of the passages AI Overviews quoted sat under a question-style heading, against 10.3% of other passages
Headings written as questions ("How do I ...?") did not set the quoted passage apart: 9.8% of the passages Google's AI Overviews quoted sat under one, against 10.3% of other passages on the same page. Lists were less common where the quote started: 13% of the quoted passages in AI Overviews started in a list, against 23% of other passages.
That is not the same as saying question headings or lists never help: a page may get cited for other reasons, and this study compares passages within pages that were already cited.
Finding 0538% of the source cards in AI Overviews were lists Google made from the page
Most source cards in Google's AI Overviews were excerpts, the page's own words in order: 59%. 38% were lists Google made from the page, an opening line followed by items, and 3% were tables that show some of the page's columns.
In list cards, the opening line was Google's own words in 23% of the list cards in AI Overviews whose opening line could be checked; the items themselves were the page's words.
Finding 0662% of the quotes that start inside a paragraph of three or more sentences start at its first sentence, against 28% by chance
Kevin Indig found the opposite for ChatGPT: 53% of citations came from the middle of a paragraph, 24.5% from its first sentence and 22.5% from its last. Google's AI Overviews start at the top of the paragraph. Of the 479 quotes in AI Overviews that started inside a paragraph of three or more sentences, 62% started at its first sentence, 18% at a middle sentence and 20% at its last.
Chance matters here. A start picked at random among the sentences of those same paragraphs would land on the first sentence 28% of the time, on a middle sentence 45% and on the last 28%. In a long paragraph the middle sentences outnumber the first and the last together, so a middle-sentence share needs its chance share next to it, and the article reporting Kevin's figure does not give one.
A blind second reading of 40 of these quotes, by an AI model that never saw my answers, put the start in the same sentence 39 times. Where the readings differed, the sentence splitter had counted a label (such as "A." or a step number) as the paragraph's first sentence, so the first-sentence share above is, if anything, low: the reader found 32 first-sentence starts where the splitter found 28.
Finding 07The passages AI Overviews quoted held fewer names than the rest of their page: 16% of their words, against 26%
Kevin Indig found cited ChatGPT text dense with names: heavily cited text had an entity density of 20.6%, against about 5 to 8% for normal English text. Against ordinary English, the passages Google's AI Overviews quoted look dense with names too. Against the rest of the same page they go the other way: by a word tagger, 16% of the words in the quoted passages were names, against 26% in other passages on the same page, and the quoted passage held fewer in 2,352 of 3,139 quotes.
The tagger counts too many names. A blind hand count of 100 of these passages, by an AI model that never saw which one was quoted, found 8% of their words were names where the tagger found 19%: it reads capitalised words in lists and labels as names. The direction held by hand: 6.4% of the words in the quoted passages were names, against 9.3% in another passage of the same page, fewer in 18 of 50 pairs and more in 10. So a share of names depends on the tool that counts it, and a comparison means most when both sides are counted the same way, on the same page.
Part of the gap comes from where passages start: other passages start in list items and loose page text more often than quotes do, and those hold more names. Keeping only passages that start in a paragraph on both sides, a check I added after seeing the first results, the gap shrinks but holds: 12% of the words in the quoted passages in AI Overviews were names, against 15%.
Kevin's other signals, measured the same way on both sides of each page:
| Signal | Kevin Indig, ChatGPT | The passage AI Overviews quoted | Other passages, same page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starts in the first 30% of the page | 44.2% | 64% | 32% |
| Starts in the last 30% of the page | 24.7% (last third) | 7% | 35% |
| Contains a question mark | 18% (vs 8.9%) | 12% | 10% |
| Subjectivity score | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Reading grade (Flesch-Kincaid) | 16 (vs 19.1) | 8.24 | 8.53 |
| Contains a definition phrase | 36.2% (vs 20.2%) | 1.0% | 0.3% |
Position is the clearest: the quotes in Google's AI Overviews start in the first 30% of the page more often than Kevin found for ChatGPT, and in the last 30% far less often. Subjectivity was about the same for the quoted passage and the rest of its page, and below Kevin's figure. The quoted passages read at a slightly lower grade, but among passages that start in a paragraph on both sides the gap reversed: 8.45 against 8.37. Question marks were a little more common in the quoted passages than in the rest of the page, a smaller gap than Kevin's. The definition phrases he names ("is defined as", "refers to", and a few like them) were rare on both sides. His article counts a wider set of definitive wording that it does not list, so that row does not test his figure.
What I would test
A snapshot shows what Google's AI Overviews quote, not what changes it, so each point below is something to test rather than a rule.
Test whether putting the answer right under its heading gets it quoted. 64% of the passages AI Overviews quoted started at a heading or in the first block below it, against 31% of other passages on the same page. The bet is that a page whose answer sits right under a heading that names the question is quoted from there; a rerun after moving one answer up under its heading would show whether the card follows.
Test the searcher's words in that heading and passage. The quoted passage held 43% of the question's words in AI Overviews, against 25% for the rest of the page. The bet is that the passage using the question's own words is the one quoted; a test would reword one section's heading and first line and watch the card.
Test answering early. 64% of the quotes in AI Overviews started in the first 30% of the page, and 62% of those that start inside a paragraph of three or more sentences started at its first sentence. The bet is that an answer placed early is quoted more often than the same answer lower down; moving one answer up the page and rerunning the question would show it.
Test question-style headings and lists before rewriting pages into them. 9.8% of the passages AI Overviews quoted sat under a question-style heading, against 10.3% of other passages, and 13% started in a list, against 23%. The bet is that turning headings into questions, or answers into lists, does not by itself change which passage is quoted; a test would rewrite a few headings as questions and watch the cards.
What this study does not show
One run. I read each source card once, on 24 September 2026. How much AI Overviews change between runs is known from my YouTube study of the same how-to questions, where 78% of the question and video pairs cited in its AI Overviews (1,362 of 1,748) were cited in all three runs. That is about which sources are cited, not where on the page the quote sits, and this study cannot show how stable the position is.
The questions come from my earlier studies, how-to questions and SEO agency hiring searches, in US English on one day. They are not a sample of what people search. Other kinds of questions may be quoted from other places.
Not every page could be read. 93% of the web pages AI Overviews cited could be read, and the card's words were found on 89% of those (88% to 91%). The rest of the misses: the words were not on the page (Google had reworded them, or the page had changed) for 49% of the missed cards in AI Overviews, and the page could not be read for 41%.
How the matching was checked. A program found each card's words on the page. I checked it with blind readers who never saw its answers. The readers were AI models (OpenAI's for the first two checks, Claude Sonnet for the last two), not people. Three earlier blind checks, each on quotes drawn fresh found errors in the matcher, which I fixed, so their quotes were not used for the score. On a fresh sample of 60 quotes, 95% of the matcher's finds were on the page, and it caught 97% of the quotes the readers found. The exact starting block agreed, within one block, for 34 of 38 quotes. I had set a bar that required that. After this check I changed the bar to what the findings use: the kind of starting block, which agreed for 36 of 38, and the position on the page, which agreed within 0.05 of the page's length for 37 of 37. Google stitches some cards from a title, a heading and a passage, so where one starts is often a judgement call. The change is logged in the study's plan.
Kevin Indig's detectors are not published, and mine are: the definition phrases, TextBlob's subjectivity score, NLTK's tagger for names (over words outside headings, since title-case headings read as names) and the Flesch-Kincaid formula. Where my figures and his differ, the tools may explain part of it; the same-page comparison uses one tool on both sides.
Findings 6 and 7 came later. I added them on 29 September 2026, after this page was first published, from the same data, and wrote their definitions into the study's plan before computing any of them. The paragraph-only comparisons in Finding 7 I added after seeing the first results.
A choice made after the data came in. The comparison passages start where a block starts, as quotes do. My first version cut them at fixed word offsets, which made headings look rarer in the rest of the page than they are and the heading gap larger than it is. I changed it while writing this, after seeing the first numbers; the figures above use the corrected comparison.
Nothing here is causal. I measured where Google's AI Overviews quote from on pages they already cite. Whether changing a page changes what gets quoted is a question for a before-and-after test, not a snapshot.
Data
900 Google searches on 24 September 2026, 842 of them with an AI Overview. Their AI Overviews had 6,364 source cards, of which 3,893 pointed to web pages. Of those, 3,626 pages could be read and the card's words were found on 3,245; 3,203 of those quotes sat in the page's main text, the base for the position figures. The comparisons use 3,243 quotes, each against up to twelve passages of its own page. Every figure has a numerator and a denominator in the study's metrics file, every page read is kept with its hash, and every search is kept as the raw response.
Cite this study
Ivan Smiljkovic (2026). 64% of the Passages Google's AI Overviews Quote Start at a Heading or Right Below One, Against 31% of Other Passages on the Same Page (Study of 3,224 Quotes). Ivan Builds. https://ivanbuilds.com/ai-overview-page-quotes.html
Every section has its own link: hover a heading and use the # to copy it.
About the author
I study how Google and AI assistants choose what to cite, using public data I collect myself, and I publish the method and limits with every study.